
Draft bill puts numerous places off limits to concealed carry; Democrats test limits of ‘sensitive spaces’
The bill shows just how far majority Democrats will go to restrict Coloradans’ gun rights

The bill shows just how far majority Democrats will go to restrict Coloradans’ gun rights

Join me in remembering Kendrick Ray Castillo today, March 14th, on what would have been his 22nd birthday.

Having met hundreds of armed school staffers over the past 6 years, I can assure the candidate that none of them think it’s a game

“The fact is that people who have evil in their heart, select schools for a reason. They are gun free zones. We don’t have the budget to have as many SROs as we should in every single school. I really believe this will help and kind of open the eyes and potential for other paths to expand this further.” — Nancy Rumfelt, Thompson School Board Education member.

There is only one question to consider when determining which candidate we should support to face Michael Bennet in November: Do we want to beat him?

You are effectively hiring a school district to teach your children, and to return them safely to you every day. You have the power to tell the district just how you would like them kept safe.

The public is invited to give input. Anyone who cannot attend in person can request a conference number to call in at dor_taxrules@state.co.us or by submitting comments via email to the same address.

“Local government is the easiest government to hold accountable.” — Laura Carno

“The criminalization of them with no grandfathering will turn a very large percentage of the population of Boulder into retroactive criminals, and people won’t register because they are afraid of confiscation,” David Kopel on Boulder gun ban.

“Colorado is an example for the western states where we value the 2nd Amendment and respect the rights of folks to carry and bear arms. And also feel like we’re going to protect people in their homes and their churches and their shopping malls and school houses where they want to be able to go and live and work without the fear of another mass shooting.” — Mike Johnston, Democrat candidate for governor
A curriculum that teaches school employees allowed to conceal carry the skills necessary to stop active shooter situations, as well as advanced medical training to deal with related injuries such as gunshot wounds.

The citizens of Senate District 11 deserve someone who will represent their interests in Denver, not someone who turns a deaf ear when they tell him he doesn’t know what’s best for them.
By Jon Caldara
If you’re a fan of limited government, personal liberty, or educational choice, Tuesday night’s election results were a downer, just another one in a long line of depressing elections that has made Colorado more California than California.
However, if you prefer a controlling elite deciding your fate, debt, class envy and teacher unions, it was just another victory in a decade’s long win streak.
I’m curious how multi-billionaire nannyist Michael Bloomberg felt about his out-of-state investment. He put $5 million toward convincing Denver voters adults must stop buying Swisher Sweets cigars (which contains flavored tobacco, the new fentanyl).
As adults drive by marijuana shops selling flavored edibles, liquor stores selling peach-infused vodka, and legal psychedelic mushroom operations, it’s adults buying smoking cessation products like Zyn in Denver that Michael Bloomberg knows is the scourge of our nation.
It didn’t matter it is already illegal for anyone under 21 years old to buy any tobacco or nicotine products, flavored or not. Bloomberg’s millions convinced voters this was a ban on children buying the stuff. He won handedly as he spent nearly $52 per “yes” vote to make it happen.
Fifty-two bucks a person was enough to convince Denverites who scream “my body, my choice!” when it comes to abortion that government needs to stay out of your uterus but shove itself down your adult lungs. He can’t run New York anymore, so he regulates Denver.
His $5 million was the most spent on any ballot issue or candidate in Colorado this year. For perspective, the class-baiting tax increase on rich people to buy free lunches for just slightly less rich people’s kids raised only $800,000. And that was a statewide question not a tiny one like Denver’s cigar ban.
Passing Propositions LL and MM, the double-down on free lunches in Colorado, was certainly no shock. But it gives us some things to speculate.
It did not surprise me MM passed. What did surprise me was it passed by a larger majority than the original tax proposal, Prop FF, just a couple years ago.
By contrast voters seem to have learned their lesson on the wolf reintroduction fiasco. If put on the ballot today, “wolves” would certainly lose. I think witnessing the debacle of flinging apex predators throughout Colorado is what drove Denver voters to recently reject the slaughterhouse ban and a ban on selling furs. They realized that maybe in some areas, government doesn’t know what it’s doing.
In the same way, the farce that is the free lunch program should’ve caused more of us to reconsider the blatant socialism of stealing from those who have more than you.
It took no time for the current free lunch program to run into the red. I mean, go figure, you offer people free stuff, and they line up to take it. The program also failed to source food locally as promised in the original Prop FF. In other words, the state really FFed the whole socialistic experiment.
Yet even after witnessing this failure, a larger percentage of people voted for MM than the original FF. More of us want to penalize successful people to empower government elite to decide what their own kids should eat.
Could this be a leading indicator the socialist value structure of “take from thy neighbor” has taken root here? Props FF and this year’s LL and MM might be the gateway drug for the cocaine of “democratic socialism.” The first one is always free. “Yo, here’s a sandwich for your kid, you know, on the house.” Before you know it, we’re replacing our successful flat income tax rate with a punitive, progressive income tax.
New York’s socialist mayor-elect spelled it out in his victory speech. “We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.”
Translation: Here in Colorado we will destroy our economy to save the Earth from climate change (while China builds a dirty coal plant every day), punish the productive, risk-taking class and chase them out of the state (see New York in California) as we micromanage every aspect of your life (like outlawing Swisher Sweet cigars, and feeding your children the meals of our choosing).
Is this the Colorado we’ll buy when some out-of-state billionaire sells it to us?

Energy Co-Ops may list a variety of places that they get their power from, but how does that work and what arrives to the customers? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
https://coloradosun.com/2025/11/20/colorado-coal-power-comanche-extension/
https://bigpivots.com/bryan-hannegan-the-bigger-leagues/
https://coloradosun.com/2025/11/17/united-power-electricity-suppliers-wind-solar-battery-energy/

After all the years warning us of the upcoming energy disaster that is Colorado’s energy policy, Amy Oliver Cooke tells us there might be a little bit of hope. Just a little bit of hope.