
VIDEO: Boulder school district rejects educational diversity
The message coming out of Boulder: We aren’t interested in a diversity of educational options.

The message coming out of Boulder: We aren’t interested in a diversity of educational options.

A simple change in cosmetics turns a commonly owned semi-automatic rifle in to an illegal “assault weapon” under Boulder’s loose definition of the term.

Maybe the next charter applicants will have the diversity school boards like BVSD are comfortable with, you know, from people who think just like them.
BOULDER–Jon Caldara, president of the free market think tank Independence Institute*, and a Boulder, Colorado resident, gives an update on how things are going with the ongoing resistance to a

If All in the Family were rebooted today, Archie would be a progressive.

The Boulder ban went in to effect January 1.

I am asking for progressives who run city government to live up to their assertion of tolerance and just let me be.

Like those who refused to go to the back of the bus, I will not surrender or destroy my guns, nor will I place my name on a government watch list.

“Being loud and being vocal and marching people into the streets, is very, very important to me because it’s important for people to know they are not alone in this. When we do this, politicians, legislators, city council members, they are going to realize they do have support behind them if they stand firm on their principle of protecting the Second Amendment.” Lesley Hollywood, march organizer.

“The criminalization of them with no grandfathering will turn a very large percentage of the population of Boulder into retroactive criminals, and people won’t register because they are afraid of confiscation,” David Kopel on Boulder gun ban.

The University is cultivating ideological uniformity—the opposite of a genuine institution of higher education.
“I’ve been asked by a state Democratic (sic) party candidate if there is a progressive group of counties. I told her that such a group is in formation, but didn’t say more.” Nancy Jackson, Arapahoe County Commissioner
By Jon Caldara
If you’re a fan of limited government, personal liberty, or educational choice, Tuesday night’s election results were a downer, just another one in a long line of depressing elections that has made Colorado more California than California.
However, if you prefer a controlling elite deciding your fate, debt, class envy and teacher unions, it was just another victory in a decade’s long win streak.
I’m curious how multi-billionaire nannyist Michael Bloomberg felt about his out-of-state investment. He put $5 million toward convincing Denver voters adults must stop buying Swisher Sweets cigars (which contains flavored tobacco, the new fentanyl).
As adults drive by marijuana shops selling flavored edibles, liquor stores selling peach-infused vodka, and legal psychedelic mushroom operations, it’s adults buying smoking cessation products like Zyn in Denver that Michael Bloomberg knows is the scourge of our nation.
It didn’t matter it is already illegal for anyone under 21 years old to buy any tobacco or nicotine products, flavored or not. Bloomberg’s millions convinced voters this was a ban on children buying the stuff. He won handedly as he spent nearly $52 per “yes” vote to make it happen.
Fifty-two bucks a person was enough to convince Denverites who scream “my body, my choice!” when it comes to abortion that government needs to stay out of your uterus but shove itself down your adult lungs. He can’t run New York anymore, so he regulates Denver.
His $5 million was the most spent on any ballot issue or candidate in Colorado this year. For perspective, the class-baiting tax increase on rich people to buy free lunches for just slightly less rich people’s kids raised only $800,000. And that was a statewide question not a tiny one like Denver’s cigar ban.
Passing Propositions LL and MM, the double-down on free lunches in Colorado, was certainly no shock. But it gives us some things to speculate.
It did not surprise me MM passed. What did surprise me was it passed by a larger majority than the original tax proposal, Prop FF, just a couple years ago.
By contrast voters seem to have learned their lesson on the wolf reintroduction fiasco. If put on the ballot today, “wolves” would certainly lose. I think witnessing the debacle of flinging apex predators throughout Colorado is what drove Denver voters to recently reject the slaughterhouse ban and a ban on selling furs. They realized that maybe in some areas, government doesn’t know what it’s doing.
In the same way, the farce that is the free lunch program should’ve caused more of us to reconsider the blatant socialism of stealing from those who have more than you.
It took no time for the current free lunch program to run into the red. I mean, go figure, you offer people free stuff, and they line up to take it. The program also failed to source food locally as promised in the original Prop FF. In other words, the state really FFed the whole socialistic experiment.
Yet even after witnessing this failure, a larger percentage of people voted for MM than the original FF. More of us want to penalize successful people to empower government elite to decide what their own kids should eat.
Could this be a leading indicator the socialist value structure of “take from thy neighbor” has taken root here? Props FF and this year’s LL and MM might be the gateway drug for the cocaine of “democratic socialism.” The first one is always free. “Yo, here’s a sandwich for your kid, you know, on the house.” Before you know it, we’re replacing our successful flat income tax rate with a punitive, progressive income tax.
New York’s socialist mayor-elect spelled it out in his victory speech. “We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.”
Translation: Here in Colorado we will destroy our economy to save the Earth from climate change (while China builds a dirty coal plant every day), punish the productive, risk-taking class and chase them out of the state (see New York in California) as we micromanage every aspect of your life (like outlawing Swisher Sweet cigars, and feeding your children the meals of our choosing).
Is this the Colorado we’ll buy when some out-of-state billionaire sells it to us?

Xcel recently shut off power for thousands of customers. Why did they do this and how could it have been avoided? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
Shutdown
Wildfire matters review committee bill that wasn’t approved.
https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/bill_5_26-0104.02.pdf
It prohibits punitive damages if certain conditions are met.
Wildfire Matters Review Committee letter https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/signed_wildfire_letter_8-26_0.pdf
https://www.utilitydive.com/news/texas-sues-xcel-panhandle-fires/808421
Guest editorial
Gas Appliance warning label
https://coloradosun.com/2025/12/19/colorado-gas-stove-warning-law-halted/
Because the grid could use a backup plan.
Yes, we’re giving away a Predator Generator.
No, this is not a drill.
Yes, it’s because reliability apparently isn’t fashionable anymore.
Starting with the first show of 2026, drop a funny, clever, or pithy comment in the show’s comment section.
That’s it. No forms. No fine print to initial. No ESG questionnaire.
At the end of the session, we’ll select our top 3–5 favorite comments.
Then you vote on the winner.
Democracy still works here. Mostly.
Winner announced on the last show in May 2026.
One comment.
One generator.
Because when the grid wobbles, satire won’t keep your lights on — but a Predator Generator will.

Grab your wallets and hold on tight.
As the Colorado Legislature gets back in session, Director of Policy for Independence Institute, Jake Fogleman forecasts the session and predicts what they’re gonna do to us.