
Balancing Colorado’s budget means ending Medicaid bloat
Higher taxes will not solve the Medicaid problem, but elected officials will strive to raise them anyway.

Higher taxes will not solve the Medicaid problem, but elected officials will strive to raise them anyway.

As usual, government never knows when to quit. Supporters of Colorado Senate Bill 24-022 may think they are protecting people from tobacco. What they are really doing is giving county

If HB 1005 becomes law, people who buy health insurance will be forced to pay even higher premiums to fund changes that likely will not benefit them.

In 2016, almost 79 percent of Colorado voters rejected single payer care.

The problem for voters is that there will never be enough money to satisfy the 4,953 active governments in Colorado.

This mean-spirited bill requires that health sharing groups operating in other states report to the Colorado Commissioner of Insurance even if just one Colorado resident is a member.

Gallagher’s limits do protect homeowners. When house prices rise more rapidly than incomes, unrestricted increases in property tax bills can force homeowners to sell.

The incentives created by Medicare for All would kill the sickest patients, increase disability, drive talented people away from health care, limit innovation, and make it difficult or impossible for Americans to access the care they need.

Unlike 3M, the government bureaucracies that once helped defeat polio and yellow fever are now too obese to even maintain warehouse stockpiles. Taxpayers need to put them on a diet before they crush the private sector that everyone’s health depends on.

The rush to shove this bill through the legislature suggests that state officials care a whole lot more about more tax revenues than they do about the will of the voters, or the welfare of smokers.

If you think your health coverage costs a lot now, just wait until Colorado state government finishes legislating parity for “behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorders.”

The next time your elected representative claims to be doing something about U.S. hospital costs, ask exactly which cost increasing regulations he proposes repealing.
It’s worrisome enough that we have to live with the ever-present threat of nuclear war hanging over our head, the fiery extermination of humanity from global warming, a worldwide depression triggered by the U.S. defaulting on its $39 trillion national debt on its way to $50 trillion, to say nothing of an uptick in falls from Denver rent-a-scooters. On top of all that, yet another crisis has descended upon the American public: Donald Trump has ended the minting of our one-cent coin, affectionately known as the penny. Good grief!
Don’t panic, 240 billion of them are still in circulation. Actually, this is long overdue. “Seigniorage” is the revenue a government derives from the difference between the face value of a coin and the cost of its mintage. (Ignore paper currency.) The U.S. Mint stopped making quarters, half dollars, and dollars out of silver when inflation made the metal content more valuable than the face value of the coins. Minting a penny now costs 3.7 cents each. The penny is the only current U.S coin with negative seigniorage.
When I was a kid, a penny had some intrinsic value. You could actually buy something with it. Place one in a bubble-gum machine, turn the crank and a candy-covered gum ball would drop out. You could even put a 1-cent stamp on a penny post card. In 1857, the U.S. stopped minting half-cent coins, and the nation survived even though a half penny actually had some purchasing power; you could buy a half-dozen cigars for that.
The cumulative inflation rate of 370% over the last 270 years since then has rendered the penny virtually worthless. Today, it isn’t worth the trouble of picking up off the sidewalk (especially if it’s face down; that’s bad luck). Dimes or quarters have replaced pennies in kids’ piggy banks. And credit cards, debit cards, PayPal, internet electronic transactions, crypto currency, automatic ACH billing, and mobile sports-betting, to name just a few alternatives, are increasingly displacing purchases with cash in general (with the exception of stacks of hundred-dollar bills in duffle bags for big illicit drug deals). Most people don’t even bother to carry coins in their pockets anymore. If you try to give the kid at the checkout counter a $5 dollar bill and three pennies for a $4.83 purchase, hoping for two dimes back, his eyes cross as he struggles to do the math in his head.
The sentimental case for keeping the penny is fading away as penny-laden references in our language such as “a penny for your thoughts,” “penny wise and pound foolish,” “penny-ante,” “penny pincher,” “pennies from heaven,” and “penny stocks,” are disappearing with generational change. Even penny loafers are out of style. Abraham Lincoln won’t be forgotten; his face will still grace the $5 bill. Canada has already eliminated its penny in 2012 (mostly to stop unruly hockey fans from throwing them onto the ice).
In your shopping cart at the supermarket, each individual item will still be priced in 1-cent increments. If you’re paying with plastic or a check you’ll pay the exact price, with no rounding necessary. Making a mountain out of a mole hill, some people are afraid retailers will cheat consumers by always rounding prices UP (which would be the to the nearest nickel, not the nearest dollar). This is ridiculous. Rounding will only apply if you’re paying with cash, and it will be on the total bill (not each item) rounded to that nearest nickel. So, a total purchase of, say, $89.01 or $89.02 could be rounded down to $89.00, saving you one or two cents. And a purchase of $89.03 or $89.04 could be rounded up to $89.05, costing you one or two cents more. This is small change and in the long run, it’ll all even out anyway.
Anti-business progressives are also stricken with UP-rounding paranoia that greedy capitalists will oppress consumers. Coming to the rescue, the (NCSLSLTTF) National Conference of State Legislatures’ State and Local Taxation Task Force (whew!) is proposing a government mandate requiring that purchases ending in 1, 2, 6 or 7 cents be rounded down to the nearest nickel, and purchases ending in 3, 4, 8 or 9 cents be rounded up. Please. This is a solution for a non-problem.
I doubt Safeway will make it corporate policy to always round up. That would be terrible public relations giving Wal-Mart the competitive opportunity to advertise they always round down (perhaps raising prices a few cents to make up for it).
Longtime KOA radio talk host and columnist for the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News Mike Rosen now writes for Complete Colorado.

Coal power plants are already one of the most reliable and inexpensively run energy options, and Colorado utilizes them for base load power. However, new legislation threatens to raise the costs on coal fired power plants. PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
https://i2i.org/us-supreme-court-to-review-boulder-climate-lawsuit-case/
https://bouldercolorado.gov/boulder-measures/community-greenhouse-gas-emissions
https://thehill.com/newsletters/energy-environment/5751603-scotus-to-consider-tossing-climate-suit/
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/HB26-1268
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/HB26-1226
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-052
https://i2i.org/the-big-shortfall-colorados-upcoming-power-plant-closures-and-planned-replacements/
Because the grid could use a backup plan.
Yes, we’re giving away a Predator Generator.
No, this is not a drill.
Yes, it’s because reliability apparently isn’t fashionable anymore.
Starting with the first show of 2026, drop a funny, clever, or pithy comment in the show’s comment section.
That’s it. No forms. No fine print to initial. No ESG questionnaire.
At the end of the session, we’ll select our top 3–5 favorite comments.
Then you vote on the winner.
Democracy still works here. Mostly.
Winner announced on the last show in May 2026.
One comment.
One generator.
Because when the grid wobbles, satire won’t keep your lights on — but a Predator Generator will.

When you go to the doctor, do you feel like you’re treated like a number? Do you remember doctors spending more time looking at their patients than looking at computer screens? Travis Bockenstedt advocates for a new medical model that keeps costs down and keeps doctors doctoring.